Unreal HeavenThe home of 2v2 and 3v3 iCTFUnreal HeavenThe home of 2v2 and 3v3 iCTF24 Aug 2026, 17:30
Deck16][
| Player | Score | Kills | Deaths | Suicides | Shots | 360 | K/D | Eff | Acc | HSK | HSA% | TTL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JD | 19 | 19 | 15 | 0 | 92 | - | 1.27 | 56% | 32% | 10 | - | 0:18 |
| kriminal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0 | - | 0:00 |
| Player | Double | Multi | Ultra | Monster | Ludicrous | Holy Shit | Best |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JD | 1 | 2 kills |
| Player | Killing Spree | Rampage | Dominating | Unstoppable | Godlike | Best |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JD | 4 kills |
Loading player feedback...
Generated from the match events and player statistics.
A tight NW DM match took place on DM-Deck16][-UH, with 2 active players recorded in the report.
JD produced the strongest overall performance, finishing with 19 score, 19 kills, and 56% efficiency.
JD led the fragging pace with 19 kills.
JD posted the best accuracy at 32%.
Banter read: JD was the main scoreboard problem, which is the polite way of saying everyone else had to live in their match.
The final table reflects the players who converted pressure most consistently across the match.
Match feedback based on the player's usual level and their role in this game.
| Player | Verdict | Role | Performance Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| JD | Godlike | Combat | I think this was one of your stronger performances, coming in at 2.00x. For DM/TDM, your next jump is turning more fights into map control rather than just isolated duels. Nothing was wildly out of line, but improving fight selection and timing around armour, belt, or key weapons would make you harder to control. Next focus: play for efficiency first: good weapon, good position, good timing, then take the fight. |
| kriminal | Feeding | Combat | This was a hard outing for you at 0.00x; treat it as a reset point, not a verdict on your ability. For DM/TDM, your next jump is turning more fights into map control rather than just isolated duels. 0% efficiency hurt you here; I think the priority is taking fewer low-percentage fights and resetting before you are forced into bad trades. Next focus: stop gambling alone into bad positions and take fights from areas you can escape from. |
Red versus Blue balance for this match only.
Per-player kills by weapon for this match.
| Player |  Enforcer |  Bio |  Shock |  Pulse |  Ripper |  Minigun |  Flak |  Rocket |  Sniper | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JD | 1 | 17 | 18 | |||||||
| Totals | 1 | 17 | 18 |
Per-player pickup control for this match.
| Player | AMP | BELT | PADS | ARMOR | HEALTH | VIALS | BOOTS | INVIS | REDEEMER | WEAPONS | AMMO | TOTAL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JD | 1 | 1 | 18 | 18 | ||||||||
| kriminal |
Weapon kills and pickup control for this match only.
Red vs Blue armor, pads, belt, and amp control for this match.
Click the coloured player buttons to show or hide lines. Hover dots for killer, victim, and match time.
Each coloured line is a player. Hover dots to see which pickup they collected.
| Totals | 1 | 1 | 18 | 18 |
Kills by weapon in this match.
Best player and weapon pairings in this match.
Different summary from the timeline graph: pickup types, power pickups, and first/last control moments.
Dots are real headshot events from combat_events. Warmup is hidden; extra time is shown when needed.
Pickup Control graph is unchanged. This line graph shows timed pickups where raw pickup events are available.
Uses the match ngLog and UHNet connection values: client NetSpeed, client FPS when logged, and ping samples across the match. Min, Avg and Max summarise the ping range, the trace shows the connection pattern, and spikes mark sudden jumps.
| Player | Client NetSpeed | Client FPS | Refresh | Min | Avg | Max | Spikes | Ping Trace | Pattern |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JD | - | - | - | 47 | 48 | 51 | 0 | Minor variation |
